000			03272nam a22002657a 4500
001			38806
003			OSt
005			20240823095904.0
008			240823b sa ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_cLTS
100			_aMcDurmon, Joel.
245			_aRejections of the Mosaic law by the Magisterial reformers, 1520-1536 / _cby Joel McDurmon.
260			_aPretoria: _bUniversity of Pretoria, _c2012.
300			_a282 pages ; _fThesis.
500			_aSubmitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Philosophiae Doctor (PHD) in the Faculty of Theology at the University of Pretoria.
505			_aHypothesis -- Melanchthon and the radical Lutherans -- Andreas Karlstadt -- Zwingli, Anabaptism, and the "Divine Law"-- The destroyer of the Godless --Luther's duplicities -- Muenster, the "New Jerusalem" -- Anabaptist fallouts -- Young Calvin's crucible -- Luther, Calvin, and the two kingdoms ethics -- Conclusion -- Bibliography.
520			_aNo name seems to have been associated with more systematic criticism in regard to political and social thought during the magisterial Reformation than that of the Old Testament lawgiver, Moses. Beginning early in the Reformation era, rejections of the need for Mosaic judicial laws are varied, broad, and explicit. In some cases, such as Luther’s and Melanchthon’s attacks on Andreas Karlstadt, alleged proponents of Mosaic civil law are given by name. In other cases they are anonymous. But what is less clear is whether anyone actually held the views attributed. After a review of literature of Melanchthon, Jacob Strauss, Karlstadt, Zwingli, Thomas Müntzer, the peasants of the Peasant War (1524–5), Luther, the Anabaptists of Münster, Calvin, and others, it is confirmed that none of the implicated writers between key dates of 1520 and 1536 actually held the view of exclusive Mosaic Law attributed, particularly by Calvin. Other motivations must have been involved in the accusations. An analysis of literature from Luther and Calvin as well as the historical background of the period makes it clear that social, political, and economic pressures influenced the magisterial reformers in regard to crucial theological expressions in which they strongly rejected the need for Mosaic civil law in society. The reformers in question restrained or altered their expressions according to the pressures of external circumstances - most importantly war and rebellion spurred by so-called “radical” reformers. As alleged theological positions were weaved with reports and denunciations of violence, Mosaic Law emerged as an allegedly dangerous ideological force, the accusation of which could marginalize opponents. In this crucible of history, in which the long shadows of rebellion and war were cast over Mosaic Law during the mid-1520s and mid-1530s, we find both Luther and Calvin (among others) writing their most vehement denunciations of Mosaic Law. Particularly, we find young Calvin, exiled, siDogmatics and Christian Ethics.
650			_aReformation
650			_aLutheran Church--Doctrines.
650			_aLaw
650			_aCivil procedure
650			_aProtestantism
700			_aBuitendag, Johan Prof. _eSupervisor
942			_2ddc _cBK _h222.1 _mMcDurmon _n0
999			_c38806 _d38806